More qualified conversations from the same list. We research each prospect, tell them how one part of their business runs, and let them correct us — then build the automation around their answer.
Name a company you'd actually target. We'll build the page they'd open and the automation they'd walk away with, and send both to you — within one working day. No call, no card.
Quote requests come in through the Typeform embedded on your commercial roofing page, and someone re-keys them into the schedule by hand.
Nothing chases a quote that goes quiet after seven days.
Every claim shows the page and the exact words it came from. Nothing is inferred from a black box — they can check us in one glance, and correct us in one click.
We reach for the tools they already pay for first. A new subscription is the last resort, not the first step — which is why these actually get done. Every step has a “this didn't work” link, so if they stall you see exactly where.
Illustrative. Live output uses that prospect's real pages and links the captured excerpt.
AI can write a convincing paragraph about someone's company in four seconds. Your prospect knows it. Their inbox knows it. Another observation about their business is not worth thirty minutes of their time.
The advantage moved from saying something relevant to doing something useful. Don't tell a prospect you're good at this. Hand them a thing that works and let them draw the conclusion.
Not a survey. A flat claim about one part of their business, drawn from their public pages, with the source attached.
One click to confirm, one line to correct. Faster to answer than to ignore — and the correction tells you something no research could.
Their correction shapes an automation built for whatever they already use — Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, n8n, or nothing yet.
You sell engagements worth five figures. So the question was never whether this costs a few hundred a month. It's whether it produces one more real conversation.
Your numbers, not ours. Put your own in — the demo does this maths with them.
Why would I give my prospect the answer for free?
You're not giving away the engagement — you're giving away a sample of it. A working automation proves you understand their operation better than any discovery call could, and the people who follow it and get stuck raise their hand at precisely the moment they're most likely to hire someone. Every step carries a “this didn't work” link. That's not a leak in the model; it's the model.
What if you get the assertion wrong?
Then they correct it, which is the better outcome. A confirmed claim tells you you read them right. A corrected one tells you something you could not have learned from outside. The page is built so being wrong costs one click and buys real information.
Does this change how I send?
No. Your domains, your sequencer, your workflow, unchanged. ProofTouch produces the destination you put in the email — you send it exactly as you always have.
What if the automation doesn't work when they run it?
They flag the step, and you see which one. That's a live signal from the person actually following it, not a quality claim from us. It's also the single warmest follow-up you'll get all month.
Is this just AI-generated personalization with extra steps?
Personalized emails describe the prospect's business back to them. This hands them something they can use. The difference is what's on the other side of the click: a paragraph about themselves, or a working process they didn't have that morning.
What results do you have?
We're early, and we'd rather show you the product than quote a number we haven't earned. Name a prospect above and judge the output directly — that's a better basis for a decision than a testimonial.
Name a prospect worth winning. See exactly what they'd receive before you commit to anything. No call, no deck, no card.
One working day. If the automation doesn't work when they run it, you'll know — and so will we.